Supporting Evidence
Item #17 Affidavit – RESPONSE
I reiterate that Uecker’s Accounts are not true.
| [Uecker’s Affidavit #17] “ Ladd wrote me again a few weeks ago. This letter was dated May 16, 2006 and was addressed to my correct Wisconsin address. It was actually sent to me, however, at Wrigley Field via Priority Mail while the Club was in Chicago for a series against the Chicago Cubs.“ |
Brewer Schedule May 2006 / Letter Information
The radio broadcaster’s affidavit can be
easily proved false by showing the Milwaukee Brewers Schedule below,
during May, and US Postal Service Access information below.
The Brewers did not play baseball against the Chicago Cubs during May 2006.
http://milwaukee.brewers.mlb.com/schedule/index.jsp?c_id=mil&m=5&y=2006
Alternative 2006 Schedule Link
| Fri, 5/12 |
Mets |
W 9-6 | 18-18 |
Bush (3-4) | Lima (0-2) |
| Sat, 5/13 |
Mets |
L 8-9 | 18-19 |
Bradford (2-1) | Turnbow (0-1) |
| Sun, 5/14 |
Mets |
W 6-5 | 19-19 |
De La Rosa (2-0) | Bradford (2-2) |
| Tue, 5/16 |
Phillies |
W 3-2 | 20-19 |
Turnbow (1-1) | Franklin (1-3) |
| Wed, 5/17 |
Phillies |
W 8-7 | 21-19 |
Capellan (1-0) | Rhodes (0-1) |
| Thu, 5/18 |
Phillies |
W 5-4 | 22-19 |
Lehr (2-1) | Madson (4-2) |
| Fri, 5/19 |
Twins |
L 1-7 | 22-20 |
Liriano (2-0) | Davis (2-3) |
| Sat, 5/20 |
Twins |
L 10-16 | 22-21 |
Baker (2-4) | Hendrickson (0-2) |
| Sun, 5/21 | Twins | W 5-3 | 23-21 | Capuano (5-3) | Crain (0 |
On the U.S. Postal Service Access internet website it shows that the item was delivered in two days to the Wisconsin City in question.( The radio broadcaster even misquotes the letter which he supplies a copy of in the affidavit as written May 16th, 2006 instead of the actual date on the letter which is May 14th, 2006.)
Label/Receipt Number: 0306 0320 0005
6593 0417
Status: Delivered
Your item was delivered at 12:12 pm on May 17, 2006 in MENOMONEE FALLS, WI 53051.
Tracking and Confirmation - Letter Dated 5-14-04
NOTE: The letter was respectfully written with sincerity and professionalism;
purely businesslike. It was
written for the purpose of requesting a few minutes of the broadcaster’s
time to discuss two projects. It included a return receipt document
to easily assist in responding and a self-address envelop with postage.
I merely had hoped to be granted a few minutes of the broadcaster’s
time and briefly outline the project ideas.
The letter was in no manner threatening or harassing. Uecker utilizes
this letter as evidence, but does not
identify what he perceived as threatening or harassing or stalking.
(click to view document)
Copy of the May 14th Letter and Attachment